[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [Subclipse-users] Incorrect EclipseZone Post

From: Hugo Visser <joegi_at_scene.nl>
Date: 2007-03-09 22:21:29 CET

On a whole other note, does that mean that now that the subversive
proposal is approved, the subclipse proposal will not be approved? If
so, how will that impact subclipse if the svn team provider for
Eclipse will be subversive?


On Mar 7, 2007, at 9:47 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:

> There is a post on EclipseZone that says I have gone to work for
> Polarion. This is not true. I am assuming it is a mistake of the
> author and that Polarion did not really spread this information at
> EclipseCon.
> http://www.eclipsezone.com/eclipse/forums/t91217.html
> Hopefully it will be corrected by the time you read this as it is
> also included in the aggregated blurb going around the Internet.
> I did recently get hired by CollabNet to work on Subversion and
> Subclipse, and I assume that is the source of the author's
> mistake. This is great new for this project (and of course me) so
> it is distressing to see this post circulating which implies the
> exact opposite has happened.
> Please do not flood the author or site with comments. I just
> wanted to clarify this in advance.
> --
> Thanks
> Mark Phippard
> http://markphip.blogspot.com/

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Fri Mar 9 22:21:52 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users mailing list.