On 2/1/07, Lira Olavo <Olavo.LIRA@gemalto.com> wrote:
>
> Another important piece of information,
>
> Even after I have succeeded to add the .class files using
> tortoise, subclise doesn't show them as it were under version control,
> and I can assure you that it is not only because of the extension,
> because I have other .class files in the same project that are under
> version control and subclise shows me those one...
> I can say to you that the difference between them was when I
> included them into version control, the .class that works fine was
> included in one shot inside a directory, while the others .class (the
> ones that subclise doesn't recognize at all) was generated inside
> eclipse itself...
>
> Please let me know if I can provide you with more information.
Eclipse has a concept of derived files. Bring up the Eclipse Resource
Properties dialog on one of these files and you will see the Derived check
box is checked. Team providers are supposed to automatically ignore derived
files. .class files compiled by Eclipse will be marked derived.
Subclipse does not decorate these items because 99% of the time they should
not be versioned and it would kill performance for us to ask Subversion the
status of these files when almost always we know they should be ignored.
I cannot think of any situation where storing .class files in Subversion is
a good idea.
I also do not think we have made any changes in Subclipse that would effect
the decoration of these files.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
Received on Fri Feb 2 02:02:23 2007