> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Phippard [mailto:markp@softlanding.com]
>
> Because I think that the Eclipse CVS developers care about
> usability and have a lot of users using their tool and thus
> get a lot of feedback. My primary contention here is that,
> from a usability point of view, cramming several options that
> are all slight variants of each other on to the same menu
> does not make the product better or easier to use. The fact
> that the CVS developers also do not have this option confirms
> (for me at least) that my feelings might be shared by others.
>
> Whether Subversion aims to be better than CVS has nothing to
> do with a simple UI discussion.
Could that be read as "Subclipse will never have more options
than CVS plugin"?
If not, never forgetting that you're the decision taker thus
have all the right to decide whatever you want about Subclipse, could
you roughly explain what would be the criteria for an option to be
judged worth of being on Subclipse and not on CVS?
Felipe
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Mon Oct 16 22:46:49 2006