[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [Subclipse-users] Can't commit regenerated dir-tree

From: Mark Phippard <markp_at_softlanding.com>
Date: 2006-06-30 14:50:18 CEST

Jiøí Mare¹ <Jiri.Mares@svt.cz> wrote on 06/30/2006 04:59:15 AM:

>
> I tried to delete the dir content but to leave the .svn dirs, but then
> subclipse won't synchronize anything. Therefore I
> tried cleanup command and things went well, I can commit new changes
....
>
> Is it the right way, or not?

Deleting folders that have .svn folders in them is very bad, so do not do
that. Subversion generally cannot recover from that and your working copy
is corrupt. Note that this is a Subversion issue.

How are you deleting the content? If you do it from within Eclipse, we
are going to capture the delete and run the svn delete command, which is
probably not what you want.

Can't you just generate the reports on top of the existing ones and let
Subversion recognize which ones are modified/added? If not, then I would
think if you deleted the content, and did not delete and folders, then
regenerating should work fine and Subclipse should just work.

Mark

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jun 30 14:50:33 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.