[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [Subclipse-users] Atomic commit with multiple projects

From: Denis Koelewijn <denis.koelewijn_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2006-05-30 09:48:58 CEST

This is solved by using the JavaSVN instead of the JavaHL binding to SVN.

There are a few more discussions in the archives about this issue. The
solution above comes from one the later discussions.

Regards, Denis Koelewijn

On 5/30/06, Andreas Krüger <Andreas.Krueger@eplus.de> wrote:
>
> A commit involving files from several Eclipse Projects, to the same SVN
> repository, is split up by Subclipse into several individual commits, one
> for each project.
>
> So what should be a single commit enters the repository in a non-atomic
> fashion.
>
> This is not nice. After all, "atomic commit" is one of the Good Things we
> SVN users are proud of.
>
> In our particular setup in this project, we have a "common / server /
> client" - splitup of our code, and will port the whole thing from CVS to
> SVN some time next month or so. I would love to be able to add "atomicity"
> to my internal "subclipse advertising campaign" ;-) .
>
> This issue had been discussed in a thread "Atomic commit with multiple
> projects" back in October 2004. (If you send an email to
> users-get.1430_1445@subclipse.tigris.org , that will give you those old
> messages, plus a few unrelated others.)
>
> The workaround promoted at that time: For the commit, do not use
> Subclipse,
> but use Tortoise or another external SVN client. For this workaround to
> work, it may be neccessary to have checked out a common root directory
> (such as "trunc"), containing all the individual Eclipse projects.
>
> Anyway, the discussion back in 2004 ended with Céderic's remark and
> question:
>
> > No, I think this is possible if the projects are from the same
> repository.
> >
> > Can someone add an issue ?
> >
> > Cédric
>
> I don't think anybody did add that issue.
>
> I volunteer. If I read nothing convincing to the contrary, I will add that
> issue, some time next month (next week, if I get around to it).
>
> Regards,
>
> Andreas
>
> P.S.: I have tried to post an earlier version of this message to
> users-return-1445-tigrisq-archive=mail-subclipse=users=
> tigris.org=tigris.org@subclipse.tigris.org
> , to keep the thread. But that has not worked. At least, I cannot find my
> own message in the mailing list archive. On the other hand, I received no
> problem notification from the mailing list software. Something did not
> work
> as expected. - So, if the earlier version did get through and this does
> produce a dupe, please excuse.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
>
>
Received on Tue May 30 09:49:13 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.