Hello Bradley,
> Is svn+ssh significantly slower than http (apache module)?
HTTP protocol is the slowest one, the fastest one is SVN and regarding
SVN+SSH I expect it to be faster than HTTP, but slower than SVN.
> The SVN checkout of my project since I migrated from CVS is easily
> 2-3 time longer than it was before, same can be said for
> synchronizing the whole project. I guess I should try doing
> some of these operations from the command line and see if
> that improves speed at all, but are particular protocols
> known to be slower than others?
When comparing with command line client, please take in account that Eclipse
introduce some overhead when handling resources that are created by check
out operation.
If you're using Linux or OSX, disabling versioning symbolic links support
could improve performance a lot (set System property
javasvn.symlinks=false). Also, it makes sense to try latest version of
JavaSVN (checkout and build it from http://svn.tmate.org/repos/jsvn/trunk/,
soon there will be 1.1.0-beta2 version published that you'll be able to
download from the web site) - there are number of performance improvements
in that version.
Alexander Kitaev,
TMate Software,
http://tmate.org/
http://jetbrains.com/tmate/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bradley Wagner [mailto:bradley.wagner@hannonhill.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 17:07
> To: users@subclipse.tigris.org
> Cc: hh-programmers@hannonhill.com
> Subject: [Subclipse-users] Slowness in svn+ssh
>
> I should preface this by saying that I'm committed to SVN and
> Subclipse at this point. I really like both, but I would like
> to solve some of the performance issues that I'm having or at
> least share them. I'm seeing some real slow downs when
> performing read operations like checkout and synchronize over
> SVN in Subclipse. I'm connecting to a local Gigabit network,
> so I'm fairly certain it's not a network problem. I'm using
> JavaSVN as that's the only way I've gotten svn+ssh to work correctly.
>
> The SVN checkout of my project since I migrated from CVS is easily
> 2-3 time longer than it was before, same can be said for
> synchronizing the whole project. I guess I should try doing
> some of these operations from the command line and see if
> that improves speed at all, but are particular protocols
> known to be slower than others?
> Is svn+ssh significantly slower than http (apache module)?
>
> Please let me know what others' experiences have been with
> regards to speed in different protocols, inside/outside of
> Subclipse, etc.?
>
> Thanks,
> Bradley
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Wed May 3 17:15:10 2006