Hello Georg,
> I'm probably asking too much if I dream of subclipse sitting
> on top of svk instead of svn, right?
I'm thinking also about building svk-like functionality on top of JavaSVN.
Latest version of JavaSVN (1.1.0.beta) does support local repository access
as well as repository replication. Being implemented as Eclipse plugin such
tool could offer richer functionality comparing to svk for Eclipse users.
What do you think on that?
Alexander Kitaev,
TMate Software,
http://tmate.org/
http://jetbrains.com/tmate/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Georg-W. Koltermann [mailto:Georg.Koltermann@mscsoftware.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 16:44
> To: users@subclipse.tigris.org
> Subject: Re: [Subclipse-users] 1.0 is released, what is next?
>
> Eugene Kuleshov wrote:
> >
> > Subclipse 1.0 is finally released now and I wonder what
> will be the
> > next?
> >
> >
> Well, I'm currently a mostly passive observer, did not have a
> chance to use subclipse beyond simple experimentation, but in
> general I am missing merge history a lot in subversion. I.e.
> you have to manually do the bookkeeping of what changeset has
> been merge from where to where etc..
> Svk does some bookkeeping here, and also offers repository
> replication.
> I actually think many of us will use svk for replication anyways.
>
> So... what about making the subclipse merge dialog understand
> merge history from svk, and be smart about which changesets
> to merge? And after the merge subclipse could also record
> the merge in the repository in svk compatible format. Not a
> seamless integration of the two, but a start. What do you think?
>
> I'm probably asking too much if I dream of subclipse sitting
> on top of svk instead of svn, right?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Georg.
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Thu Apr 13 16:56:36 2006