Re: [Subclipse-users] 1.0 is released, what is next?

"Georg-W. Koltermann" <Georg.Koltermann@mscsoftware.com> wrote on
04/13/2006 10:44:17 AM:

> So... what about making the subclipse merge dialog understand merge
> history from svk, and be smart about which changesets to merge? And
> after the merge subclipse could also record the merge in the repository
> in svk compatible format. Not a seamless integration of the two, but a
> start. What do you think?
>
> I'm probably asking too much if I dream of subclipse sitting on top of
> svk instead of svn, right?

I think you are, yes. For one thing, svk uses its own merge process, at
least in some cases. If we were going to integrate with something, it
would more likely be the svnmerge.py script that the Subversion developers
have created and are supporting. Only because it only uses the Subversion
libraries.

I'd welcome a patch that attempted to do either.

Mark

_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. and SoftLanding Europe Plc by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Thu Apr 13 16:49:58 2006