Re: [Subclipse-users] 1.0 is released, what is next?
From: Aaron Digulla <digulla_at_hepe.com>
Date: 2006-04-12 22:02:38 CEST
Mark Phippard wrote:
I think the Synchonize view should be a priority, now. There are still
- Update of the *properties* of a directory should not update the
- Updates should slavishly obey what the sync view shows (no matter how
This is related to merging different revisions.
These two are just the ones I remember. More, anyone?
These are very subtle problems which caused a lot of discussion on the list.
-- Aaron "Optimizer" Digulla a.k.a. Philmann Dark "It's not the universe that's limited, it's our imagination. Follow me and I'll show you something beyond the limits." http://www.philmann-dark.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.orgReceived on Wed Apr 12 22:08:01 2006 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.