On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 20:52 -0500, Mark Phippard wrote:
> I have looked at the JavaHL code some more and I do not see why what we are
> doing in svnClientAdapter would interfere with their initializing of the
> native resources. We are just doing the System.loadLibrary(), but we then
> construct and use an SVNClient(). All of the initialization should happen
> when this object is first constructed. I do not see anything in the JavaHL
> code that would skip over this because we have loaded the library.
>
> What do you think?
Oh wait, simpler theory -
eclipse/plugins/org.tigris.subversion.subclipse.core_0.9.37/lib/svnjavahl.jar
contains an older SVNClient which does not call the init stuff since
older versions of javahl didn't have it. Does that make any sense?
I don't really know enough about the broader context to know.
Havoc
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Mon Feb 27 03:14:50 2006