Hy Alexander,
I'm an stupid Programmer, and there facts matters me. A few weeks ago we
changed the Code-Repository from CVS to CVS. A few Problem i had, i
think you read it. But our biggest Problem today is the speed of the
connections while working on the Repository. Working on HTTP, ist slow,
but the Authentication works, working on SVN, the Authentication cannot
be done like others.
We tested it on programmers daily works, checkout, sync, commit, update
a few times, and we see, CVS is faster then SVN. I knew, SVN has a few
Features nice to have, but if the Tools are as much slower, its n Problem.
Miha Vitorovic on this List writes it's n Problem in SVN, not on
subclipse, so i may ask what can i do to fasten up this.
Alexander, i belive you, SVN should be faster, but it isn't here. Sory
Thanks for your Answer.
\Robert
P.S. i'm not only an stupid Programmer *gg*
Alexander Kitaev schrieb:
>Hello Robert,
>
>I would like to add that direct performance comparision of CVS vs Subversion
>doesn't consider certain aspects of Subversion that could affect real
>performance. For example, during update operation only file deltas are sent
>over network, not full file contents, also apache HTTP server may compress
>the data it sends. Comparision against "BASE" version of the file (to review
>local, not yet committed modifications) is performed without establishing
>network connection at all.
>
>So, you should consider that overall Subversion client performance may be
>better then CVS one in general (due to the less amount of data sent over
>network).
>
>Alexander Kitaev,
>TMate Software,
>http://tmate.org/
>http://jetbrains.com/tmate/
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Robert Einsle [mailto:robert@einsle.de]
>>Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 2:27 PM
>>To: users@subclipse.tigris.org
>>Subject: [Subclipse-users] Performance ofConnections
>>
>>Hy List,
>>
>>we testet the Performance of the Connections to Repository
>>(CVS, HTTP, SVN), and the interesting fact is:
>>
>>The Timereference is the CVS-Connetion to an Repository.
>>Connecting to the SVN-Repo via HTTP and JAVA-HL takes about 4
>>Times then CVS Connecting to the SVN-Repo via HTTP and
>>JAVA-SVN takes about 2 Times Connecting to the SVN-Repo via
>>SVN takes nearly the same time like CVS.
>>
>>We tested it on Local Network (100 MBit switched) and on
>>VPN-Connections.
>>
>>Is it posible to speed up the Connections via HTTP, or ist it
>>posible to let lvnserve authenticate via pam (to an LDAP-Server)?
>>
>>Thanks for Help
>>
>>\Robert
>>
>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
>>For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jan 31 13:22:52 2006