[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [Subclipse-users] "Mark resolved" seems to be missing

From: <kevin.slater_at_pfpc.com>
Date: 2005-12-23 15:25:33 CET

Or, since it's very likely you're doing web-app development, can you switch
to Eclipse 3.1 and the Web Tool Project plugin (WTP)? That gives you a lot
of what RAD does (basic features, not the UML and other stuff) and since it
has A LOT less extra gee-gaws, it's snappier as well.


Thursday, December 22, 2005 6:49 PM
To: users@subclipse.tigris.org
From: Mark Phippard <markp@softlanding.com>
Subject: Re: [Subclipse-users] "Mark resolved" seems to be missing

> Either I just became a developer again or we are switching back to CVS
> (screaming in agony).

Given your requirements, if you cannot move to RAD 6.0, then staying with
CVS sounds like the best option.

Are the RAD 6 options technical or financial? I use RAD 6 with a WAS 5.1
test environment no problem.



Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. and SoftLanding Europe Plc by IBM
Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org

The contents of this email are the property of the sender. If it was not addressed to you, you have no legal right to read it. If you think you received it in error, please notify the sender. Do not forward or copy without permission of the sender.
Received on Sat Dec 24 01:25:33 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.