Thanks for the explainations.
Are there some plans to improve performance or does it have only a low
priority?
Marc.
Martin Letenay wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>after an update that hasn't retrieved any file (because the
>>project is already uptodate), it seems to me that Eclipse
>>starts to re-build the whole project. Wouldn't it make sense
>>that subclipse inform Eclipse more precisely about which
>>files have been changed?
>
>
>
> Yes. It would.
> ;-)
>
> Well, it's know problem but there's not know 100% correct solution.
> The very problem comes from the subversion itself.
> Even in case there was no change done to the working copy, the (AFAIR)
> .entries file in .svn meta folder is touched on the filesystem.
> Subclipse then, does not parse the content of the .entries, but just listens
> on the "resource modified" event reported by the underlying eclipse ...
>
> There are few more such less-than-optimal features of Subclipse related to
> performance.
> The main problem is to find out reliable mechanism for various events - to
> watch for modification to files done within eclipse (edits), to check
> for modification caused by svn actions triggered by subclipse and also to
> recognize the changes done to working copy by external tools (cmd line,
> tortoise etc ...)
>
> And of course not forgetting the reather poor performance of "svn status" on
> Windows' filesystems
>
> Martin
Received on Tue Oct 11 16:59:28 2005