I want to ask them why I have to do that:
svn up
svn ignore
svn up
svn ci
(works well)
while I actually want to do that:
svn up
svn ignore
svn ci
(tells me outdated transaction)
The question is: If there is no other person working on that repository, and those commands are run in that direct sequence (in a batch, done in less than a second), why is svn ci complaining of outdated transactions? The reasons told in the FAQ are not matching my situation here.
That's what I want to ask them.
Mit freundlichem Gruss / With kind regards
Markus KARG, Staatl. gepr. Inf.
Entwicklung / R & D
QUIPSY QUALITY GmbH
________________________________
Von: Mark Phippard [mailto:markp@softlanding.com]
Gesendet: Do 06.10.2005 15:05
An: users@subclipse.tigris.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: Commit Failed
"Markus Karg" <markus.karg@quipsy.de> wrote on 10/06/2005 09:03:24 AM:
> I checked a few things and I am convinced that it is not a Subclipse
problem:
> It also happens when I'm using svn command line. :-(
>
> So I'll ask again on the SVN mailing list.
What is there to ask? You need to run svn up on the folder.
Mark
_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. and SoftLanding Europe Plc by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Thu Oct 6 23:06:59 2005