Ah interesting. I just assumed it was RAD. I seem to remember procexp
told me the file was being used by the eclipse java.exe process, but
I'll double-check tomorrow.
Mark Phippard wrote:
>Dan North <dan@tastapod.com> wrote on 08/01/2005 12:43:34 PM:
>
>
>
>>I have a bunch of jars under version control in subversion. These are
>>referenced by a number of Java and J2EE projects in RAD (Eclipse 3.0).
>>Unfortunately this means I can't do a subversion update - Eclipse
>>complains that the files are "in use", which means that the update
>>fails, which means that I then need to shut down RAD and do a svn
>>
>>
>cleanup.
>
>
>>In the worst case I am seeing messages like: Can't copy
>>'...\.svn\tmp\text-base\one-of-my-jars.jar.svn-base' to
>>'...\.svn\tmp\text-base\one-of-my-jars.jar.4.tmp': The system cannot
>>find the file specified. I have only managed to solve this by blowing
>>away the checkout and start over with a fresh one.
>>
>>Is there a setting in RAD that says "copy jars out of the way to some
>>cache area and leave my original ones alone stupid"?
>>
>>
>
>I have never seen this. What makes the files "in-use"? Are you sure this
>isn't some other problem? I think virus checkers have caused problems
>like this in the past. Not necessarily for Subclipse, but Subversion in
>general.
>
>Mark
>
>
>_____________________________________________________________________________
>Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
>_____________________________________________________________________________
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
>
>
>
Received on Tue Aug 2 07:46:43 2005