Re: Versions [ was: non manageable project ]

Russel Winder <russel@russel.org.uk> wrote on 07/14/2005 08:10:27 AM:

> On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 08:04 -0400, Mark Phippard wrote:
>
> > PS - As others pointed out, to use 0.9.31 you need Subversion 1.2. You
do
> > not need JavaSVN.
>
> I had been using Subversion 1.1.4 and so sticking with Subclipse 0.9.30
> and using JavaSVN 0.8.8.1. For various reasons I have taken the risk
> (there is a critical bug report out for Subversion 1.2.0 on Debian) of
> moving to 1.2.0. This means I can use Subclipse 0.9.31 but is there a
> JavaSVN for this? Or is your comment that JavaSVN is no longer needed
> for using Subversion 1.2.0 and Subclipse 0.9.31?

I meant that many people, including myself, would prefer to use JavaHL.
The previous poster implied that you had to install JavaSVN and of course
there is no such requirement or even recommendation.

At least for now, JavaHL is my "official" recommendation for using
Subclipse.

There are debian packages available for subversion with the javahl
enabled.
The packages are provided by http://www.ggtools.net/

source.list entry
deb http://www.ggtools.net/files/debian/unstable/ ./

It is also very easy to build Subversion and JavaHL from source.

Mark

_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________
Received on Thu Jul 14 22:17:30 2005