Far greater performance I believe.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Bowden [mailto:jlb@houseofdistraction.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 6 April 2005 3:04 AM
To: users@subclipse.tigris.org
Subject: Re: [ANN] JavaSVN v0.8.7
Russel Winder wrote:
>On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 08:17 -0700, Bill Wohler wrote:
>
>
>
>>Conversely, if JavaHL doesn't work for you, use JavaSVN ;-).
>>
>>That was my case on Linux. After struggling to doctor the Debian
>>source distribution to give me a JavaHL library, I punted and pointed
>>Eclipse to JavaSVN and was up and running in moments.
>>
>>
>
>I too am using Debian GNU/Linux and came to the conclusion that to use
>JavaHL I would end up having to download entire the Subversion source
>and get involved in lots of compiling. I ran away from doing that,
>downloaded JavaSVN and, like you, was up and running in just a few
>minutes.
>
>Personally I would not recommend anyone using JavaHL now that there are
>no ready made binary distributions -- just get straight in to JavaSVN
>
>
Does anyone know what is the advantage of JavaSVN over the command line
client? I know that it (JavaSVN) does not support symlinks. Does it
offer anything to make up for this?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Wed Apr 6 08:27:31 2005