Re: Problem with "Use specified module name:"

I was hoping Subclipse could keep one working copy for each bind point. Atomic changes would be limited to bind points unless Subversion supported a larger transaction scope, but I could live with that. It's very rare that we need to refactor something between bind points.

Mark Phippard <MarkP@softlanding.com> wrote:
That is likely because SourceSafe does not have the concept of a Working
Copy so it can pretty much do whatever it wants. Subversion has a working
copy, which is how it is able to track things like moves and deletes, and
we have to work with it.

Mark

_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org

                
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger
 Show us what our next emoticon should look like. Join the fun.
Received on Tue Apr 5 06:13:54 2005