I haven't used subclipse on 3.1 m3 but I am using it on 3.1 m4 and m5
and it works fine. Are you running on Windows or Linux? Try running
Subclipse on 3.01 or 3.1M5a.
The quality of Subclipse is very good and the major features you would
expect are all available. Synchronization support is fairly new and I
haven't used it much. Use the SVN Repository Browsing Perspective to
checkout code into a project or create directories in a repository.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexis Gallagher [mailto:alexisgallagher@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 6:31 AM
> To: users@subclipse.tigris.org
> Subject: Subclipse vs. built-in cvs client
>
> Hello,
>
> What are the main features missing from subclipse compared to
> eclipse's built-in cvs client? For instance, does subclipse use the
> same screen for resolution of merge conflicts? Or is it the case that
> subclipse has the same main features now, and the main difference is
> stability?
>
> I tried to answer this question myself by just installing subclipse
> and kicking it around, but I get an error whenever I try to open the
> subclipse perspective or configure it from preferences (I'm running
> M3, and the error dialog says subclipse is unable to load its ui
> classes). So unless I am just unlucky, I assume stability is already a
> big difference.
>
> My problem I would like to set up a subversion server instead of cvs.
> But all users are on eclipse, and some are not familiar with command
> lines, or version control systems, so it's key to have a good gui on
> it all.
>
> I'm wondering what the consensus view of the experts is, that is, of
all
> of you.
>
> Thanks,
> alexis
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
>
Received on Thu Mar 10 03:14:57 2005