Re: make install-javahl fails

On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 08:54:29PM -0500, Mark Phippard wrote:
| Derrick,
|
| Thanks for all that info, it was great. I will definitely be saving it!
|
| A couple of things I wanted to add:
|
| 1) We ship the JavaHL JAR file with Subclipse, so you should not need to
| add the one you built to the PATH. Prior to the 0.9.26 release, I do not
| think we were shipping the 1.1.3 version of the JAR, so in that case you
| may have been better off with the one from the build.

Oh, ok. Either way there is a potential mismatch, either between
subclise and javahl.jar or javahl.jar and the .so. I guess the
documentation just needs to note when the changes are too incompatible
and which versions are acceptable.

| 2) I do not believe there is anything about the version of Java you used
| for the build that should matter. You should be able to build with any
| version of Java and run with any other. I don't know if using Sun Java vs.
| say Blackdown might be an issue, but I do not see why it would be. I do
| not think Eclipse's SWT would work real well if that mattered.

Good point. Yeah, I guess if the JNI header files don't change binary
compatibility then it wouldn't be an issue.

-D

-- 
If you want to know what God thinks about money,
just look at the people He gives it to.
    -- Old Irish Saying
 
www: http://dman13.dyndns.org/~dman/            jabber: dman_at_dman13.dyndns.org