Yes, thats correct. I have installed subversion 1.1.3 from the RPM and I
build
the javahl by using 1.1.3 release sources.
I have not found any javahl related problems.
Mika
Steve Cohen wrote:
> lamikr wrote:
>
>>
>>> Certainly not on the Subclipse team. We complain now and then to the
>>> Subversion devs but there is little we can do. They cannot make RedHat
>>> provide specific packages and frankly I suspect that JavaHL doesn't get
>>> distributed because of the whole Java and open source issue. Just
>>> look at
>>> the hoops you have to go through to install Java itself as a Debian
>>> package
>>> as an example.
>>>
>>>
>> Yes, for example Mandrake Soft is only shipping that kind of programs
>> which can be build by using other tools and libraries they can freely
>> ship
>> and because they can not ship javac they can not build javahl and does
>> not include it in their subversion rpm. (They are however delivering
>> such
>> kind of java apps what they can build with gcj)
>>
>> I am got everything working even I am using Mandrakes subversion rpm
>> packages.
>> I just build and installed the javahl library by myself by using
>> sources I downloaded
>> from the subversion homepage.
>>
>> Mika
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
>>
>>
>>
> OK. Let me see if I am understanding you correctly. Are you saying
> that you are running subversion from a binary RPM together with javaHL
> that you built from source? Have you had any problems that way?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
>
>
Received on Wed Feb 9 18:16:22 2005