Re: Is synchronization supported?

"Andrew R. Rothwell" wrote in message...
> Sure. But I'm interested in running wholly within Eclipse, using
> Subclipse. C'est Subclipse's raison d'etre, oui?

    In my opinion, not really. To me, its most important raison d'etre is to
track refactoring operations, which it already does beautifully. I don't do
any other version control operations from within Eclipse.

> You're talking Subversion v CVS. I already know Subversion beats
> CVS hands down - in many ways. That's not my issue. I want Subclipse
> to work properly.

    I mention the comparison because you are implicitly saying:

CVS + (great Eclipse integration) > SVN + (better VC features) - (missing
Eclipse synchronization)

    In my calculus, the better version control features far outweigh the
synchronization support.

    However, I might well feel differently if I was stuck on Linux, too,
without TortoiseSVN.

Patrick Rusk
Received on Sun Nov 28 04:46:52 2004