Hello,
> Yes we would be happy to use your library. Actually, subclipse uses
> svnClientAdapter which supports both javahl and command line
> interface. SvnClientAdapter can probably adapt to your library too.
I've checked out subclipse sources (version for Eclipse 3.0), and it seems
that most of the methods ISVNClientAdapter could be already implemented to
use javasvn library. I will be glad to do it myself, at least the very first
version (but I will appreciate any help, of course!) . Am I understand
correct that I should implement API located at
http://svn.collab.net/repos/subclipse/trunk/svnClientAdapter/ ?
>From the first galnce, I think this first version will not support "diff",
"switch", "annotation", "ignorePattern" and "configDirectory" related
methods. Does the basic library functions will work without these methods?
Of course, eventually all the methods will be implemented :)
Thanks,
Alexander Kitaev.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: C§Ûdric Chabanois [mailto:cchabanois@no-log.org]
> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 11:10 PM
> To: users@subclipse.tigris.org
> Subject: Re: Using pure java svn library instead of javahl?
>
>
>
> >Hello All,
> >
> >What do you think about making subclipse use pure java svn client
> >library instead of javahl?
> >
> >I'm asking because I'm developing one (library) and it is
> already able
> >to do the basic svn operations, both on the working copies
> and directly
> >on repository. It is also possible and not complex at all to
> make the
> >library work with eclipse IResources objects instead of
> java.io.File to
> >access file system.
> >
> >Library development is not finished yet, but I suppose the
> more users
> >it will have the faster it will progress.
> >
> >I do think that making use of pure java library instead of
> javahl will
> >make subclipse better (i.e. portable and may be faster), and
> probably
> >even will allow to implement more interesting features, because the
> >library I'm working on provides richer API then javahl bindings.
> >
> >You may take a look at the library at http://tmate.org/svn/ I'll be
> >glad to hear your opinions!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> Yes we would be happy to use your library. Actually, subclipse uses
> svnClientAdapter which supports both javahl and command line
> interface. SvnClientAdapter can probably adapt to your library too.
>
> I did not try your library yet but you we are really interested !
>
> C¨¦dric
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
>
>
Received on Sat Oct 16 22:19:44 2004