[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [Subclipse-dev] Server side use of graphing functionality?

From: John Beranek <john_at_redux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:37:46 +0000

John Beranek wrote:
> Mark Phippard wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:50 AM, John Beranek <john_at_redux.org.uk> wrote:
>>> I've been experimenting with the graphing functionality of Subclipse,
>>> and it's rather good, albeit a bit slow to build the cache.
>> I've actually been really happy with the performance. It is much
>> better than I thought it could be. Obviously my repositories could
>> just be a lot smaller than yours, but I only work on a slow DSL
>> connection full-time. Building the cache of Subversion's repository,
>> which is the biggest one I work with, is fast.
>
> Well, I must admit we don't yet have a very big Subversion repository
> yet - in fact we've not yet even switched to Subversion. However, if our
> CVS repository is anything to go by (2 million file commits over >10
> years making up a 350GiB repository) we will have a lot of revisions
> very quickly if we switch.

Hmm, count of file commits (from Bonsai) isn't perhaps the right
guesstimate for Subversion-equivalent revisions. Over the life of the
repository there have been "only" 430,000 different log messages, again
according to our Bonsai database.

John.

-- 
John Beranek                         To generalise is to be an idiot.
http://redux.org.uk/                                 -- William Blake
------------------------------------------------------
http://subclipse.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1043&dsMessageId=1075960
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [dev-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org].

Received on 2009-01-30 20:30:29 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Dev mailing list.