[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [Subclipse-dev] Server side use of graphing functionality?

From: John Beranek <john_at_redux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:37:46 +0000

John Beranek wrote:
> Mark Phippard wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:50 AM, John Beranek <john_at_redux.org.uk> wrote:
>>> I've been experimenting with the graphing functionality of Subclipse,
>>> and it's rather good, albeit a bit slow to build the cache.
>> I've actually been really happy with the performance. It is much
>> better than I thought it could be. Obviously my repositories could
>> just be a lot smaller than yours, but I only work on a slow DSL
>> connection full-time. Building the cache of Subversion's repository,
>> which is the biggest one I work with, is fast.
> Well, I must admit we don't yet have a very big Subversion repository
> yet - in fact we've not yet even switched to Subversion. However, if our
> CVS repository is anything to go by (2 million file commits over >10
> years making up a 350GiB repository) we will have a lot of revisions
> very quickly if we switch.

Hmm, count of file commits (from Bonsai) isn't perhaps the right
guesstimate for Subversion-equivalent revisions. Over the life of the
repository there have been "only" 430,000 different log messages, again
according to our Bonsai database.


John Beranek                         To generalise is to be an idiot.
http://redux.org.uk/                                 -- William Blake
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [dev-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org].

Received on 2009-01-30 20:30:29 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Dev mailing list.