[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [Subclipse-dev] why is it that if i copy/paste over a file that it is then an outgoing deletion?

From: Johan Compagner <jcompagner_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 16:21:19 +0200

ahh thx
will try to look into that

On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Martinescu, Eduard <
Eduard.Martinescu_at_globalcrossing.com> wrote:

> If I follow this discussion, I think the solution you are looking for is
> not 'revert' , but 'add'.
>
>
>
> 1) Delete a versioned file from project
>
> 2) Restore the file from local history via 'undo'
>
> 3) Do and 'svn add' against the file, it will change the pending
> state from 'delete' to 'replace'
>
>
>
>
>
> So the solution is that if we could detect the 'undo' as such, we could
> issue an 'svn add' command to undo the pending delete operation.
>
>
>
> Ed
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Designing to requirements and walking on water are EASY......
>
> ...... So long as both are Frozen.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Johan Compagner [mailto:jcompagner_at_gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 08, 2008 10:08 AM
> *To:* dev_at_subclipse.tigris.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Subclipse-dev] why is it that if i copy/paste over a file
> that it is then an outgoing deletion?
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Johan Compagner <jcompagner_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > > You delete the file it is gone. Subversion does not store it for you
> > > anywhere. If you revert, Subversion can only put back the pristine
> > > version.
> >
> > no need for that that subversion stores it somewhere. I dont care.
>
> I do not follow this anymore. I thought we were discussing ideas for
> a patch you wanted to work on and my suggestions were all along those
> lines.
>
>
>
>
> i just commented that i dont care about if svn has a copy of the (changed)
> file or not locally .
> Eclipse already has that, so thats not the problem, i only want to get rid
> of the scheduled delete state
> without using the complete revert command thats all.
> svn state should be updated, but the file shouldnt be touched by
> subclipse/svn
> it should keep its hands of the actual file. the file is fine it is just
> the state that is wrong.
>
> johan
>
>
>
Received on 2008-05-08 16:22:10 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Dev mailing list.