Re: [Subclipse-dev] Subclipse 1.2.0 end game
From: Magnus Naeslund <mag_at_kite.se>
Date: 2007-02-09 21:19:51 CET
Mark Phippard wrote:
+1 from me even though I've only supplied small patches, and my reasons are very selfish ;)
A team at a big bank here are moving to Eclipse 3.2 "Callisto" soon and we always thought it sucked to start using a "unstable" release of Subclipse, even though some of us have been using Subclipse 1.2.x since long. It's release is overdue in my opinon since it's proven to be much more useful than the stable branch. We've seen few or no problems stabilitywise compared with the stable branch.
Regards,
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.