Re: [Subclipse-dev] SvnAnt ready for 1.0 GA release ?

On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Martin Letenay wrote:

> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Daniel Rall [mailto:dlr@collab.net]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 1:47 AM
> > > > To: dev@subclipse.tigris.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [Subclipse-dev] SvnAnt ready for 1.0 GA release ?
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Mark Phippard wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Daniel Rall <dlr@collab.net> wrote on 07/18/2006 07:28:35 PM:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, 19 Jun 2006, Mark Phippard wrote:
> > > > > > Martin, last I checked, I was getting some command-line adapter
> > > > test
> > > > > > failures with Subversion 1.4.x and trunk (on Linux) caused by
> > > > changes
> > > > > > to the output of the 'svn' binary. These failures seem to be
> > gone
> > > > > > with the latest svnant trunk (supplanted by a different test
> > > > failures
> > > > > > which I'll summarize in another email).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1 on release -- shall I tag it and bag it?
> > > > >
> > > > > I do not recall if he made a tag, but I think he already made and
> > > > > announced the release.
> > > >
> > > > Yup, I see the tag, and see that the web site has been updated.
> > > > Excellent!
> > >
> > > Well,
> > >
> > > I've made a "silent" release.
> > > The tag is there, distribution package uploaded and the web page is
> > updated.
> > > I just did not dare to send any mail to announce it officially.
> >
> > Any particular reason not to announce it (e.g. waiting for 1.1)?
>
> No, not really.
> I just did not feel enough "ownership" and I thought you would like to do it
> ...
>
> Although there were some fixes to svnClientAdapter done yesterday and I have
> few planned for next days,
> so maybe we can wait and announce the 1.0.1 instead.

How about tagging trunk and releasing it as 1.1?