Re: [Subclipse-dev] Eclipse 3.1/3.2 Support

Brock Janiczak wrote:
> It is probably using reflection to create the action class, so it needs
> a no-arg constructor. Just add a new constructor that takes no params
> and it should be ok. The proposed comment is optional.

That was it. Thanks Brock!

Now all I gotta do is figure out why the bindings don't work if the
action set is not active, and we're in like Flynn.

:Denny

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Sun May 28 08:10:45 2006