Re: [Subclipse-dev] [PATCH] Local conflict in synchronize view

"C. K. So" <kitckso2@gmail.com> wrote on 03/09/2006 02:24:52 AM:

> In synchronize view, it show conflict only if both local and remote are
> modified. Local conflict are shown as outgoing change only, I think it
should
> show as conflict, right?

I do not know that I agree, although I will agree that this whole area is
confusing. There are really two types of conflicts that we have to deal
with.

Synchronize conflicts. These are shown as a conflict in the view.
Subversion conflicts. This would typically show as an outgoing change in
the view, but I think it would show as a conflict if there was also a
Synchronize conflict.

The problem is that there are a different set of options that should be
performed in each case.

The other minor problem is that Synchronize conflicts might very well be
something that Subversion could auto-merge on an update. Ideally, that
would be reflected in the view, but it is probably a matter of personal
taste as I know there is a sizable population of users that for whatever
reason do not trust that tools like Subversion and CVS can auto-merge
conflicts.

Mark

_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. and SoftLanding Europe Plc by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Thu Mar 9 15:31:32 2006