Re: [Subclipse-dev] Help needed - Subclipse performance problem

Brock Janiczak <brockj@tpg.com.au> wrote on 02/25/2006 08:18:44 PM:

> I have commited the annotation patch, but i am a bit uneasy about
> the change to the add operation. I have another patch that uses
> recursive adds where possible. It has passed all of my testing, but
> i would prefer it if someone else had a look. It is a very non
> trivial change and makes assumption about the resources being passed
> in (they do not overlap). The patch is attached to this email.

I gave the patch a test and my theory was correct. With this change,
there is no way to intelligently ignore the files that should not be
added. Subversion just adds them.

I think we should just stick to the simple change of removing the refresh.

Mark

_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. and SoftLanding Europe Plc by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Sun Feb 26 02:52:09 2006