[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [Subclipse-dev] Help needed - Subclipse performance problem

From: Mark Phippard <markp_at_softlanding.com>
Date: 2006-02-26 02:28:55 CET

Brock Janiczak <brockj@tpg.com.au> wrote on 02/25/2006 08:18:44 PM:

> Mark Phippard wrote:
> I wasn't, but i just had another very quick go and it looks like you can
> remove the status refresh from the add command entirely.
> Can you commit this and the Annotate patch?
> I have commited the annotation patch, but i am a bit uneasy about
> the change to the add operation. I have another patch that uses
> recursive adds where possible. It has passed all of my testing, but
> i would prefer it if someone else had a look. It is a very non
> trivial change and makes assumption about the resources being passed
> in (they do not overlap). The patch is attached to this email.

Suppose I am not storing my .class files in a bin folder. When I take
this option, what stops Subversion from adding the .class files? If we
just let Subversion do a recursive add then it is going to process the
files according to its own rules. It will know nothing about derived
files or the Eclipse ignore list.


Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. and SoftLanding Europe Plc by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Sun Feb 26 02:29:02 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Dev mailing list.