Brock Janiczak <brockj@tpg.com.au> wrote on 02/25/2006 08:18:44 PM:
> Mark Phippard wrote:
> I wasn't, but i just had another very quick go and it looks like you can
> remove the status refresh from the add command entirely.
>
>
> Can you commit this and the Annotate patch?
>
> I have commited the annotation patch, but i am a bit uneasy about
> the change to the add operation. I have another patch that uses
> recursive adds where possible. It has passed all of my testing, but
> i would prefer it if someone else had a look. It is a very non
> trivial change and makes assumption about the resources being passed
> in (they do not overlap). The patch is attached to this email.
Suppose I am not storing my .class files in a bin folder. When I take
this option, what stops Subversion from adding the .class files? If we
just let Subversion do a recursive add then it is going to process the
files according to its own rules. It will know nothing about derived
files or the Eclipse ignore list.
Mark
_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. and SoftLanding Europe Plc by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subclipse.tigris.org
Received on Sun Feb 26 02:29:02 2006