> I see three major hurdles in the docs currently:
> 1. Incomplete - the docs are sprinkled with TODO's and some stuff (like
> synch and the repos. browsing perspective
We intend to focus on this area. Providing a complete set of
> 2. Lack of review: I haven't heard many - if any - comments regarding
> the docs
Knowing there was so much missing, it was hard to review stuff. I made a
few edits here and there a while back.
> 3. Feature instability: It's hard to document a moving target,
> especially the graphics are made for several different versions of
> Eclipse, even going back to 2.0.
We are going to update all of the screenshots. I am not horribly concerned
about consistency. We have a wide array of users, so the occasionaly
Linux/OS X screenshot is good. Obviously, the Eclipse 2.x screens should
Feature wise, I have added a lot in the last few weeks. I only have a
couple of more things planned so I think it is going to be stabler. I
think every svn command/feature is now implemented somewhere.
Previously, you added a lot of stuff for the Help Contexts. It would be
great if you wanted to update this, such as adding it to all of the new
dialogs that are missing it. Even if you just put the basic stuff in and
let me worry about updating the XML to point to the new pages it would be a
big, big help. Otherwise, I plan to tackle this when the help is complete.
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. and SoftLanding Europe Plc by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
Received on Wed Nov 30 10:03:11 2005