[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [Subclipse-dev] New svnant release ?

From: Daniel Rall <dlr_at_finemaltcoding.com>
Date: 2005-10-12 19:03:42 CEST

On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Mark Phippard wrote:

> "Martin Letenay" <mle@whitestein.com> wrote on 09/20/2005 11:04:19 AM:
>
> > I think it's time for next release of svnant.
 
Long since past time. :)

> > All the unit tests are passing now, the svnClientAdapter was cleaned up
> > and stripped of unnecesary dependencies ...

I'm getting 5 test failures on Linux from the commandline tests (attached).
Previously, I'd left the code with 0 failures on Linux, and 2 on Windows.

I have not been able to execute the JavaHL tests, either (due to native
library loading issues).

> > Shouldn't we release RC2 ?
> > Or maybe even 1.0. ?

As before, +1 as soon as all tests pass.

> > Another question too: what is our position to JavaSVN in svnant context?
> > Are we going to include it in 1.0.x release line ?
>
> I think it should include JavaSVN since that would let us build a drop and
> go distribution that would work for most people.
 
Sounds fine to me.

> What about those patches that have been submitted? They all seem worthy
> to me. I do not care if they go into 1.0 or 1.1 as long as there is a
> committment to move forward on the latter in a timely manner.
 
Fixing the test cases and putting out a new release should take priority to
incorporating new code. Incorporating the code on a branch doesn't really
address the problem of a finite quantity of development resources.

- Dan

Received on Thu Oct 13 03:03:42 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Dev mailing list.