during the last commits I've added few classes to the sources and I'm not
sure whether I correctly followed some "legal" guidelines.
I quickly went through the code in core and it seems not all source files
are following the same schema.
I'm not at all fluent in all these legal issues with multiple types of
public licenses, but I believe there is one for subclipse and the source
should clearly state it ...
Is there a correct file header copyright statement specified somewhere ?
P.S. Since Eclipse 3.1 now supports project specific settings, should such
settings be directly commited ( I mean stuff in .settings folder) ?
Received on Tue Aug 16 21:11:51 2005
This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Dev