Re: [Subclipse-dev] Performance regression in Quick Diff (0.9.32)
Martin Letenay wrote:
>Just a status update:
>I examined your patches and their consequences and they are of course
of course? You don't know me very well do you :)
I am glad the patch looked good.
>What just happened is that your fixes inspired me to take a deeeeper look
>surrounding classes and then I found myself refactoring most of the
>classes and the way sync infos are constructed.
>I expect I might get finished by this weekend.
>The expected result is again some increase in performance and maybe also
>some behavioural improvement.
>It's a bigger stuff, so I might need your help with testing then ...
Send the patches to this list and i would be glad to take a look. I
really need to get a better understanding of this sync stuff.
On a slightly related note. There is a bug in the system that talks
about not using the resource variants for base resources. In your
investigation, is this possible? Resource variants seem to be cached in
the meta data somewhere. We don't really need this since we have a base
copy sitting in the WC already.
Received on Sat Jul 30 12:04:04 2005
This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Dev