Re: [Subclipse-dev] svnAnt Version
Mark Phippard wrote:
>I was chatting with Daniel on IRC about svnAnt and it occurred to me that
>there is really no reason for svnClientAdapter and svnAnt to not be
>considered 1.x releases. They are both solid and complete for what they
>Daniel is going to work on a 1.0 RC release for svnAnt with an aim on doing
>a 1.0 when Subversion 1.2.1 is released. Subclipse will still be 0.9.xx
>We were also debating what svnAnt should include. I tend to think it
>should include just the Java code. We could either add instructions for
>downloading the Win32 binaries from Subversion, or make our own download.
>Someone using svnAnt likely already had the CLI, so why include it again.
>Not to mention a good amount of svnAnt users probably are not even using
>If we do include the binaries, shouldn't they at least be in a "bin" folder
>or "win32" folder?
I think too that we should not include the binaries anymore.
>Thoughts and comments are welcome.
I am not sure that all junit tests will pass for svnant, at least when
using command line interface.
I think that command line interface does not work very well in some
cases because svn output is hard to parse.
Received on Sat Jun 18 20:19:40 2005
This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Dev