[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN

From: David Corbin <dcorbin_at_machturtle.com>
Date: 2004-11-08 00:26:56 CET

Just a a few comments from the peanut gallery...

> 3. Update to Revision is in fact a 'Replace with revision' action in
> eclipse terms. I think we should keep the eclipse terminology.

Being consistent with Eclipse is a very good thing.

> 4. We could use the ecliplse 3.0 cvs images to make the subclipse
> icons to be consistent with the eclipse ui.

However, I do have a problem with being consistent here. Subclipse should
really have it's own identity, not look just like CVS. I noticed that the
perspective icon is NEARLY identical the CVS perspective. And, the resource
decorator looks exactly the same. This makes it very hard to distinguish
between the two. I don't have specific recommendations for what they SHOULD
be, but I think this icons should be diffierent. Icons that represent
actions that are common to many source control systems should however, be in
common between different team providers.

David Corbin
Received on Mon Nov 8 10:26:56 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Dev mailing list.