Re: javahl Type Safety issue.
From: McClain Looney <mlooney_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2004-09-27 21:52:05 CEST
Unless there is some compelling failure, danger or performance problem
By the way, I seem to have missed your patch for this. did it get eaten ?
-- McClain Looney firstname.lastname@example.org ----- Original Message ----- From: Robert Simmons <email@example.com> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 03:34:38 +0200 Subject: javahl Type Safety issue. To: firstname.lastname@example.org Greetings. I noticed that there are a number of enumerations in the javahl Java code. For example, look at NodeKind. I wonder if these could be converted to typesafe enum pattern  It shouldn't be that big of a deal I would think and would make the interface much tighter and typesafe. References:  Bloch, Josh (2001), "Effective Java Programming Language Guide", Page 104, Addison-Wesley, ISBN 0-201-31005-8  Simmons, Robert (2004), "Hardcore Java", Page 168-182, O'Reilly, ISBN 0-596-00568 -- Robert Simmons Jr. -- Senior Software Architect, Consultant -- jambit GmbHReceived on Tue Sep 28 05:52:05 2004
This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Dev mailing list.