Fwd: bindings->javahl libstdc++ link patch; filed issue #2031

Given this, should we just include the apr dlls in the win32 build, or
stop shipping it entirely (as we have for *nix)?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Patrick Mayweg <mayweg@qint.de>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 17:26:13 +0200
Subject: Re: bindings->javahl libstdc++ link patch; filed issue #2031
To: m@loonsoft.com

Hi McClain,
this is something completly different. The core subversion libraries do
not use the static apr libraries any more but the apr dll's. So for
subversion 1.1.x and up the apr dll's are required like the db4 and the
openssl libraries.
The win32 will build an dll's with unresolved externals in first place.
Patrick

McClain Looney wrote:

>Hi Patrick,
>
>Before this gets marked done, there seems to have also been a change
>in the win32 javahl build, our users are reporting missing symbols
>from libapr since we started using the 1.1rc2 build supplied by
>yourself.
>
>Perhaps the win32 build should be gone over as well?
>
>On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:13:50 +0200, Patrick Mayweg <mayweg@qint.de> wrote:
>
>
>>Hi Holger,
>>After some looking around in 1.1.0-rc2 and 1.0.6, I think I
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>

-- 
McClain Looney
m@loonsoft.com