[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: indecent proposal

From: McClain Looney <m_at_loonsoft.com>
Date: 2003-11-24 18:11:03 CET

actually, now that i think about it, the only change i made to
svnclientadapter was the https protocol fix in the svnurlhandler (that's been
fixed in trunk hasn't it?).

i could probably abandon my branch copy.

On Monday 24 November 2003 11:01 am, Cédric Chabanois wrote:
> It's ok for me.
> Why do you need svnclientadapter on your branch ?
> I think svnclientadapter should be the same for subclipse, svn-ant and
> subclipse-3 

-- 
McClain Looney
LoonSoft LLC
m@loonsoft.com
Received on Tue Nov 25 04:11:03 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.