Re: Building subclipse on Linux
From: McClain Looney <m_at_loonsoft.com>
Date: 2003-09-26 14:40:00 CEST
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Friday 26 September 2003 02:23 am, lamikr_mdk wrote:
Yes, javahl is a mess.
> 1) Can I just take the newest subclipse sources (ie no anything special
> 2) Do I need to use Eclipse M3 or will 2.1 work as well?
> 3) Are there some tweaking I need still to do for the configure files or
Possibly, most of it is taken care of automatically. it appears as though the
I will be updating the patch shortly to resolve the TeamImages issue I
btw, i verified that checkout, commit and history work. Drilling into the
Public key E3122EF8 available
This is an archived mail posted to the Subclipse Dev mailing list.