[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: More Questions from Karen

From: Garrett Rooney <rooneg_at_electricjellyfish.net>
Date: 2006-07-13 20:54:59 CEST

On 7/13/06, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net> wrote:
> Garrett Rooney wrote:
> > Ok, some more questions about the bylaws...
> >
> > In section III-5-C-3
> >
> > http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn-org/trunk/bylaws.html#III-5-C-3
> >
> > we say that who gets to vote on an issue is determined when the notice
> > about the vote is sent out, not when the vote occurs. Is there any
> > reason not to decide based on who's eligible at the time of voting?
>
> I can't think of a good reason, no.

The only thing I thought of was so you couldn't try to stack the deck
in your favor by voting in people who agree with you, but that seems
rather fringe...

> > In section IV-4-A-1-c
> >
> > http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn-org/trunk/bylaws.html#IV-4-A-1-c
> >
> > we say that we need a unanimous vote of the members to remove a
> > director. Aside from the fact that the member is unlikely to vote for
> > themselves, this just seems odd. Any reason it's not 51% like
> > removing a member?
>
> 100% feels high. 51% feels low. 2/3s?

Well, no real argument here, but if that's the case shouldn't it also
be 2/3s to remove a member?

-garrett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: svn-org-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: svn-org-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jul 13 20:55:05 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Organization mailing list.