[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Active members vs All members

From: Daniel Rall <dlr_at_collab.net>
Date: 2006-03-31 20:18:21 CEST

On Thu, 30 Mar 2006, Garrett Rooney wrote:

> Just relaying a concern brought up on IRC by sussman, should section
> III.5.C.3 refer to 2/3 of the active members at the time of the
> initial notice? It seems like requiring 2/3 of all members sets us up
> for situations where it's possible we can't get quorum at all due to
> having more than 1/3 of the total members inactive.

I'd prefer active members, which if not defined elsewhere could be
defined as members who've posted to the mailing list and/or made a
commit within the last X (3?) months.

Daniel Rall

  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Fri Mar 31 20:18:28 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Organization mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.