Re: Active members vs All members

On Thu, 30 Mar 2006, Garrett Rooney wrote:

> Just relaying a concern brought up on IRC by sussman, should section
> III.5.C.3 refer to 2/3 of the active members at the time of the
> initial notice? It seems like requiring 2/3 of all members sets us up
> for situations where it's possible we can't get quorum at all due to
> having more than 1/3 of the total members inactive.

I'd prefer active members, which if not defined elsewhere could be
defined as members who've posted to the mailing list and/or made a
commit within the last X (3?) months.

-- 
Daniel Rall