Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, 16 May 2020 13:46 +0200:
> On 16.05.2020 12:00, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 09:13:38PM +0000, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >> IIRC the soak was to end on Wednesday and any change requires at least
> >> a week's extension.
> >> Here's the patch. I smoke tested it and it passed, but I'm seeing tests
> >> randomly fail even in unpatched trunk so I can't an unqualified +1.
> > I would prefer if we just nominated this for 1.14.1 as usual.
> > This is something that is very, very easy to work around for packagers.
> > And I don't think we are seeing a lot of people making their own builds
> > from source these days, anyway. And even then, in the worst case they ask
> > for help and it's easy to solve.
> > So I see no reason to fix this for .0, not even with the hypothetical case
> > in mind where we would drop python2 support to a stronger degree than
> > we already have.
> > If it is deemed very important, we could just document this in release
> > notes under "Known issues" until 1.14.1 comes out.
> Sure, that makes sense, too. After all, we have a bunch of
> python-releated fixes already on trunk that are easily candidates for .1.
Done in r1877835. Revisions welcome. ☺
Received on 2020-05-17 00:02:02 CEST