[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: future of our "experimental" features

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 12:37:04 +0100

On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 10:30:12PM +0000, Julian Foad wrote:
> Nathan Hartman wrote:
> > Julian Foad wrote:
> > > I did already make the experimental features hidden by default in "svn
> > > help"; and revealed with "-v" option.
> > >
> > > We don't necessarily need more than that.
> > >
> > > If we do want to go further in hiding them, I suggest the next step is:
> > >
> > > * create a ~/subversion/config setting to opt-in to enabling
> > > experimental features;
> > >
> > > * disable the experimental commands/options (shelving, viewspec,
> > > wc-copy-mods) unless that flag is enabled.
> > >
> > > However, I can't think of any specific reason why that's really
> > > important. Can anyone?
>
> For 'shelving' there are substantially different pros and cons between v3
> (best capture of changes, but really slow to create a shelf) and previous
> versions. Therefore it would be nice to give the user the option to choose
> a different version.
>
> To accommodate this, I have implemented on the branch
> 'decouple-shelving-cli' the ability to choose shelving v3 (default) or v2
> (by setting SVN_EXPERIMENTAL_COMMANDS=shelf2). I pulled the shelving-v2
> code in from 1.11.x and added it to libsvn_client, renaming APIs so the v2
> ones differ from the v3 ones.
>
> I have no intention to implement dynamic loading of this part of the
> libsvn_client API. (In principle, that would be a nice direction to go, to
> make truly pluggable features.)
>
> In a default test run, the shelving v3 tests pass and the shelving v2 tests
> are skipped. With SVN_EXPERIMENTAL_COMMANDS=shelf2, the v2 tests are run
> (and they pass); (I haven't added corresponding skips to the v3 tests for
> this case).
>
> I think this is good to merge to trunk. What do you all think?

I agree with this plan and would be in favour of a merge to trunk, especially
because we have seen requests from users asking for shelving v2 to be restored.

Of course it would be nice to see v3 being finished but that would obviously
involve more time and effort than you're able to spare right now. Thank you
for volunteering the time to find and implement an interim solution!
I hope we will eventually see this feature developed to its full potential.
Received on 2020-03-10 12:37:27 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.