On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 9:09 PM Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> hartmannathan_at_apache.org wrote on Thu, 21 Nov 2019 04:23 +00:00:
> > +<p>The convenience script that downloads Subversion's minimal
> > +build-time dependencies, get-deps.sh, has been updated to download
> > +py3c. This script is found in the source distribution's root
> > +directory. For the full list of Subversion's dependencies, see the
> > +INSTALL file in the same directory.</p>
> Suggest to link to the INSTALL file.
Done in r1870317.
Also in r1870317, made mention of get-deps.sh a link.
I went ahead and pointed both links to branches/1.14.x; currently
there is no explicit revision number in the links because that
information isn't known yet. Perhaps these should eventually point at
the tag? Then again, that would be useless for pre-release
I'm replying to several related emails below...
> I'm not sure whether "INSTALL" and "get-deps.sh" should be set in <tt/>,
> being filenames. In svnbook they would be, but I'm not sure what our
> house style for release notes is.
The only other example, in the 1.18 release notes, was not in any
special format. I went ahead and kept this the same way. Obviously if
special formatting should be used, that is easy to do.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 1:49 PM Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> The link need only be valid when the first 1.14.0-* prerelease is
> announced (to announce@, not just to dev@); until then, 1.14.html is
> work in progress. 1.A.x branches are created after alphas but before
> betas. It's not likely that we'll do a 1.14.0-alpha1, and furthermore,
> I'd rather risk a broken link in an alpha release than in a beta or RC
> release. Therefore, I'd err on the side of making the link point to
> branches/1.14.x _now_ with a TODO reminding us to point the link to
> trunk if we do an alpha release…
Done in r1870318.
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 11:55 AM Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> Nathan Hartman wrote on Mon, 18 Nov 2019 15:46 +00:00:
> > The only problem with this idea is that the link won't take the reader
> > directly to the information about Python. INSTALL contains a lot of
> > other information to wade through.
Ah, that is incredibly convenient! Thanks for mentioning it. I went
ahead and made a note of that in my notes...
Received on 2019-11-24 18:26:20 CET