[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: SWIG Python bindings build with SWIG 4.0

From: Yasuhito FUTATSUKI <futatuki_at_poem.co.jp>
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 08:10:41 +0900

On 2019/10/20 6:59, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 19.10.2019 23:06, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 19.10.2019 19:55, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> On 19.10.2019 11:45, Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote:
>>>> On 2019/10/18 8:39, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>>>> On 17.10.2019 23:46, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>>>>> On 17.10.2019 23:01, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>>>>>> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 22:56:29 +0200:
>>>>>>>> On 17.10.2019 22:37, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, 17 Oct 2019 06:49 +00:00:
>>>>>>>>>> On 16.10.2019 10:01, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Which reminds me: it'd be nice to set up a buildbot to run the
>>>>>>>>>>> build and
>>>>>>>>>>> test process under Python 3. Any committer can edit the buildbot
>>>>>>>>>>> scripts[1], but the question is which of the buildbot slaves
>>>>>>>>>>> has Python 3
>>>>>>>>>>> installed?
>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-macosx-local-python3
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Been there, done that, bought the DVD.
>>>>>>>>> Why are svnadmin_tests 69 and tree_conflict_tests 26 passing on that
>>>>>>>>> bot?  They (currently) fail under python3.
>>>>>>>> I don't know. It's possible, I suppose, that the activation of the
>>>>>>>> python3 virtual environment has no effect on the test driver. It
>>>>>>>> might
>>>>>>>> not be a bad idea to have the tests print the Python version in the
>>>>>>>> summary and possibly in the log of every test case.
>>>>>>> What's the value of $(PYTHON) in Makefile?  That's what the «check»
>>>>>>> target uses.
>>>>>> Yep, apparently that's the bug ... I'm testing script changes now,
>>>>>> along
>>>>>> with r1868566 for good measure.
>>>>> I've set up this:
>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-macosx-local-python3-swig
>>>>>
>>>>> It will build and test the core libraries and swig-py bindings with
>>>>> Python 3 on the swig-py3 branch.
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope ... build #0 running as we speak.
>>>> Unfortunately build #2, which ran after upgrading SWIG and Python, failed
>>>> to build SWIG Python bindings because of SWIG 4.0, as reported on
>>>> SVN-4818.
>>>>
>>>> This also affects on trunk with SWIG 4.0.
>>>> (e.g. https://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-macosx-full/builds/2418)
>>>>
>>>> With attached patch on trunk (trunk_build_with_swig4_patch.txt) and
>>>> on swig-py3 (swig_py3_build_with_swig4_patch.txt), *.so can be produced,
>>>> but the modules don't work correctly.
>>>>
>>>> It seems they were caused by incompatibility of Python code for proxy
>>>> object generated by SWIG, and it can not be resolved so simple....
>>>> (importlib module vs simply use 'import', absense of _swig_setattr()
>>>> and _swig_getattr(), etc.)
>>> My bad. I downgraded to Swig 3.0.12 and restarted the failed builds.
>>
>> Hm, that did not really help. On the swig-py3 branch:
>>
>> /bin/sh: line 1: 62481 Segmentation fault: 11 /srv/virtualenv-3/bin/python /srv/buildbot/slave/svn-x64-macosx-local-python3-swig/build/subversion/bindings/swig/python/tests/run_all.py
>> make: *** [check-swig-py] Error 139
>>
>>
>> So, the Python bindings seem to have crashed the Python 3 interpreter on
>> macOS?
>
> Yes, they did:
>
> Process 28278 stopped
> * thread #2, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=1, address=0x48)
> frame #0: 0x00007fff373ab746 Python`PyErr_Restore + 61
> Python`PyErr_Restore:
> -> 0x7fff373ab746 <+61>: movq 0x48(%rbx), %rdi
> 0x7fff373ab74a <+65>: movq 0x50(%rbx), %r13
> 0x7fff373ab74e <+69>: movq 0x58(%rbx), %r12
> 0x7fff373ab752 <+73>: movq %r15, 0x48(%rbx)
> Target 0: (Python) stopped.
>
> frame #3: 0x0000000103800fea _core.so`PyInit__core at core.c:40158:12
> 40155 m = Py_InitModule((char *) SWIG_name, SwigMethods);
> 40156 #endif
> 40157
> -> 40158 md = d = PyModule_GetDict(m);
> 40159 (void)md;
> 40160
> 40161 SWIG_InitializeModule(0);
> (lldb) print m
> (PyObject *) $0 = 0x000000010279ad70
> (lldb) print *m
> (PyObject) $1 = {
> ob_refcnt = 785
> ob_type = 0x000000010026ea30
> }

I guess the _core module linked incompatible Python library to execute.

on https://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-macosx-local-python3-swig/builds/6/steps/Build/logs/stdio :
[[[
checking for compiling Python extensions... clang
checking for linking Python extensions... clang -bundle -undefined dynamic_lookup -isysroot /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.14.sdk -F/usr/local/opt/python/Frameworks -framework Python
checking for linking Python libraries... -bundle -undefined dynamic_lookup -F/usr/local/opt/python/Frameworks -framework Python
]]]

Is this correct?

-- 
Yasuhito FUTATSUKI <futatuki_at_poem.co.jp>
Received on 2019-10-20 01:11:24 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.