[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Issue tracker housecleaning: SVN-1722

From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_apache.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:46:28 +0100

Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Nathan Hartman wrote on Wed, 16 Oct 2019 04:47 +00:00:
>> Is it sensible to add a regression test?
>
> Yes, unless other tests already cover this.

Of course, ideally, it is lovely to improve the test coverage, if you
have spare time and spare enthusiasm, or can do so really quickly so it
doesn't impact other activities. However, it's not required and not
necessarily worth it. A perfectly valid choice would be to prioritize
moving on instead to reviewing another old open issue.

- Julian
Received on 2019-10-16 10:46:33 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.