On 13.09.2019 14:16, Nathan Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 3:08 AM Branko Čibej <brane_at_apache.org
> <mailto:brane_at_apache.org>> wrote:
>
> On 13.09.2019 09:00, Julian Foad wrote:
> > Nathan Hartman wrote:
> >> Once there's actually something to show we can cross the bridge
> of either asking Infra (nicely of course) or moving it to a
> subdirectory of staging, with a link to coming soon, preview the
> new site. But let's not get ahead of ourselves.
> >
> > That all sounds good. Just one thing: a new branch that is a
> sibling of 'publish' and 'staging' would seem to be the right
> level. The existing 'site-ng' branch contains virtual copies of
> both, which seems the wrong level, and also catching up and
> re-purposing an old branch makes slightly confusing (and slightly
> inefficient) history. Create a new one!
>
> Yes indeed ... and maybe even create a copy of staging/, not publish/,
> to make future merge history clearer.
>
> -- Brane
>
> Yes. I reached this conclusion also when I ran the merge and realized
> that this is a branch that contains branches. So I didn't commit that
> mess.
>
> If there are no objections I'll remove site-ng and create a branch
> from staging called staging-ng. I think it should be under site,
> adjacent to staging and publish, and not under subversion root?
Yes, that's correct.
-- Brane
Received on 2019-09-13 14:18:59 CEST