[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Change to Subversion PMC rule for approving backports

From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_apache.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 21:17:03 +0100

Nathan Hartman wrote:
> + A change needs three +1 votes (for an LTS release line) or one +1
> vote
> (for a non-LTS release line) from full committers (or partial
> committers
> for the involved areas), and no vetoes, to go into A.B.x.
>
> snip
>
> - (If a change affects the build system, however, it is considered a
> core change, and needs three +1's.)
> + (If a change affects the build system, however, it is considered a
> core change, and so for an LTS release line needs three +1's.)
>
>
> Just proofreading...
>
> Is this 2nd change correct or was the intention three +1s for build
> system changes regardless if LTS or not?

It's correct...

> I'm asking because the 1st change already says that changes to LTS
> require three +1s.

I quoted it here out of its context. In its context it makes sense.

- Julian
Received on 2019-08-29 22:17:05 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.